Who Should Not Do?
People With Shoulder Mobility Issues
During the squat to overhead press, the pressing portion requires you to extend both arms overhead. Your anterior deltoids are the primary movers and are responsible for bringing your arms up.
If you suffer from shoulder mobility issues that mean you can’t extend your arms straight up, work on this first. Even small deviations in form can cause your body position to change, placing more stress on other muscle groups.
The squat to overhead press requires a coordinated effort between your upper and lower body muscle groups for safe performance.
People With Lower Back Problems
People with lower back problems should address possible mobility issues or injuries before performing the squat to overhead press.
The front loading position places less stress on your lumbar spine. However, you still use your erector spinae to maintain a neutral back position throughout. Exercises that provide added back support should be the primary focus. This allows you to work on the lower back issue and develop better core strength first.
Benefits Of The Squat To Overhead Press
Works The Whole Body
The squat to overhead press combines two popular exercises. This gives you a compound movement pattern that works several major muscle groups.
The squat portion of the lift works your quads, hamstrings, glutes, core, and erector spinae. The overhead press portion primarily targets your anterior deltoids and triceps.
If you’re looking for a full-body workout with several added benefits, the squat to overhead press ticks all the boxes.
Aids Functional Movements
Performing functional movement patterns requires good balance and coordination. Balance helps you to move properly during daily movements such as walking up the stairs or getting into the car. Coordination is the way your muscles and limbs work together to perform different movement patterns. This works alongside your balance.
The squat to overhead press uses three functional movement patterns; the hip hinge, front squat, and overhead press. Each of these requires balance and coordination to be performed correctly.
By combining all three into one movement pattern, the squat to overhead press is great for developing these functional movements.
Improves Endurance, Strength, And Power
The squat to overhead press uses several large muscle groups to produce a high amount of force. Similar to the push press or jerk, your lower and upper body work together to power the weight overhead.
With this, you learn how to generate force from the ground using an explosive movement pattern over a short period. This makes it a great exercise to develop strength and power.
When repeated, the squat to overhead press is also great for improving endurance. This is due to the large amount of effort required to use a dynamic movement pattern.
Enhances Cardiovascular Health
Regular cardiovascular exercise is well-known to improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of disease. When combined with resistance training, the effect on cardiovascular disease risk maybe even better.
The squat to overhead press combines cardiovascular exercise with resistance training. This makes it a great way to improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of disease.
Frequently Asked Questions
The squat to overhead press is a great exercise that combines two popular exercises into one compound movement pattern. As a full-body exercise, it’s good for developing strength, conditioning, and mobility.
As a compound exercise, the squat to overhead press works several major muscle groups. Primary movers include your quadriceps and anterior deltoids. Secondary movers include your glutes, hamstrings, serratus anterior, triceps, and erector spinae.
Resources
Endomondo.com refrains from utilizing tertiary references. We uphold stringent sourcing criteria and depend on peer-reviewed studies and academic research conducted by medical associations and institutions. For more detailed insights, you can explore further by reading our editorial process.
- SantaBarbara, N.J., Whitworth, J.W. and Ciccolo, J.T. (2017). A Systematic Review of the Effects of Resistance Training on Body Image. Journal of strength and conditioning research, [online] 31(10), pp.2880–2888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000002135.
- Suchomel, T.J., Nimphius, S. and Stone, M.H. (2016). The Importance of Muscular Strength in Athletic Performance. Sports medicine, [online] 46(10), pp.1419–1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0486-0.
- Lorenz, D. and Morrison, S. (2015). CURRENT CONCEPTS IN PERIODIZATION OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING FOR THE SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPIST. International journal of sports physical therapy, [online] 10(6), pp.734–47. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637911/.
- Silva, W., Viana, R., Santos, D., Vancini, R., Andrade, M. and Claudio de Lira (2018). Profiling Rest Intervals between Sets and Associated Factors in Resistance Training Participants. Sports, [online] 6(4), pp.134–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6040134.
- Morris, S.J., Oliver, J.L., Pedley, J.S., G. Gregory Haff and Lloyd, R.S. (2022). Comparison of Weightlifting, Traditional Resistance Training and Plyometrics on Strength, Power and Speed: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports medicine, [online] 52(7), pp.1533–1554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01627-2.
- Myer, G.D., Kushner, A.M., Brent, J.L., Schoenfeld, B.J., Hugentobler, J., Lloyd, R.S., Vermeil, A., Chu, D.A., Harbin, J. and McGill, S.M. (2014). The Back Squat. Strength and conditioning journal, [online] 36(6), pp.4–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1519/ssc.0000000000000103.
- Nystoriak, M.A. and Bhatnagar, A. (2018). Cardiovascular Effects and Benefits of Exercise. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, [online] 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00135.
- Schroeder, E.C., Franke, W.D., Sharp, R.L. and Lee, D. (2019). Comparative effectiveness of aerobic, resistance, and combined training on cardiovascular disease risk factors: A randomized controlled trial. PloS one, [online] 14(1), pp.e0210292–e0210292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210292.
0 Comments